11/21/2003 Entry: "KENNEDY ASSASSINATION COVERUP CONTINUES"



THE COVERUP CONTINUES
MAJOR MEDIA COMPLICIT IN THE CONTINUING COVERUP OF THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION
by voxfux

Kennedy assassination

Forty years ago, John F. Kennedy was assassinated by the same ultra right wing elements in the United States who rule today. When these extremists assassinated Kennedy they seized a moment in history and radically transformed America into a wasteland of lost opportunities, forever killing the hopes that this country once had to be a decent nation. And America has never been able to recover from those stolen opportunities by the extremist right wing. America is now spiraling deeper and deeper into the abyss of fascism.

Complicit in this plot to rob America of it's rightful future was the CIA under Allen Dulles and the FBI under J. Edger Hoover.

Today the conspiracy to coverup the true facts surrounding the right wing's assassination of Kennedy continues with a massive coordinated effort by the CIA controlled major media to obliterate the facts surrounding the conspiracy to kill Kennedy and reinforce the widely dismissed and disbelieved lie that Oswald acted alone.

The 40th anniversary of Kennedy's assassination has become once again a field day for the right wing extremists who control the media to churn out lie after lie about how Oswald acted alone. With bogus 3D reenactments designed to fool the eye and boggle the mind.

It is a chilling reality today that there is such divide between what is really real and what the official media backed presentation of that reality is. Nearly the entire major media is nothing more than a huge brainwashing machine churning out disinformation carefully scripted by the puppet-masters of the New World Order. CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX are all under the complete control of the New World Order industrialists. Nearly all "news" on these channels are lies.

NOW THE ONLY RELIABLE SOURCE OF INFORMATION LEFT IS THE INTERNET.

All other forms of information can and are compromised.

Soon America will descend into a military dictatorship and any resemblance to great nation it once was will be lost forever.

This thread will act as a repository of the chilling REALITY of the right wings assassination of Kennedy. Please do not include personal comments or opinions in this thread. All such opinions and personal comments will be deleted. This thread will act as a central point to gather and document the chilling facts surrounding the many suspicious players and events of those dark days when the New World Order made their move and steered this country into hell.

voxfux

Viewer Commentary: 32 comments


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5267.htm
Gen. Franks Doubts Constitution Will Survive WMD Attack

John O. Edwards

Friday, Nov. 21, 2003: (NewsMax) Gen. Tommy Franks says that if the
United States is hit with a weapon of mass destruction that inflicts
large casualties, the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of
a military form of government.

Franks, who successfully led the U.S. military operation to liberate
Iraq, expressed his worries in an extensive interview he gave to the men
's lifestyle magazine Cigar Aficionado.

In the magazine's December edition, the former commander of the military
's Central Command warned that if terrorists succeeded in using a weapon
of mass destruction (WMD) against the U.S. or one of our allies, it
would likely have catastrophic consequences for our cherished republican
form of government.

Discussing the hypothetical dangers posed to the U.S. in the wake of
Sept. 11, Franks said that "the worst thing that could happen" is if
terrorists acquire and then use a biological, chemical or nuclear weapon
that inflicts heavy casualties.

If that happens, Franks said, "... the Western world, the free world,
loses what it cherishes most, and that is freedom and liberty we've seen
for a couple of hundred years in this grand experiment that we call
democracy."

Franks then offered "in a practical sense" what he thinks would happen
in the aftermath of such an attack.

"It means the potential of a weapon of mass destruction and a terrorist,
massive, casualty-producing event somewhere in the Western world - it
may be in the United States of America - that causes our population to
question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our country in
order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing event. Which
in fact, then begins to unravel the fabric of our Constitution. Two
steps, very, very important."

Franks didn't speculate about how soon such an event might take place.

Already, critics of the U.S. Patriot Act, rushed through Congress in the
wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, have argued that the law aims to curtail
civil liberties and sets a dangerous precedent.

But Franks' scenario goes much further. He is the first high-ranking
official to openly speculate that the Constitution could be scrapped in
favor of a military form of government.

The usually camera-shy Franks retired from U.S. Central Command, known
in Pentagon lingo as CentCom, in August 2003, after serving nearly four
decades in the Army.

Franks earned three Purple Hearts for combat wounds and three Bronze
Stars for valor. Known as a "soldier's general," Franks made his mark as
a top commander during the U.S.'s successful Operation Desert Storm,
which liberated Kuwait in 1991. He was in charge of CentCom when Osama
bin Laden's al-Qaeda attacked the United States on Sept. 11.

Franks said that within hours of the attacks, he was given orders to
prepare to root out the Taliban in Afghanistan and to capture bin Laden.

Franks offered his assessment on a number of topics to Cigar Aficionado,
including:

President Bush: "As I look at President Bush, I think he will ultimately
be judged as a man of extremely high character. A very thoughtful man,
not having been appraised properly by those who would say he's not very
smart. I find the contrary. I think he's very, very bright. And I
suspect that he'll be judged as a man who led this country through a
crease in history effectively. Probably we'll think of him in years to
come as an American hero."

On the motivation for the Iraq war: Contrary to claims that top Pentagon
brass opposed the invasion of Iraq, Franks said he wholeheartedly agreed
with the president's decision to invade Iraq and oust Saddam Hussein.

"I, for one, begin with intent. ... There is no question that Saddam
Hussein had intent to do harm to the Western alliance and to the United
States of America. That intent is confirmed in a great many of his
speeches, his commentary, the words that have come out of the Iraqi
regime over the last dozen or so years. So we have intent.

"If we know for sure ... that a regime has intent to do harm to this
country, and if we have something beyond a reasonable doubt that this
particular regime may have the wherewithal with which to execute the
intent, what are our actions and orders as leaders in this country?"

The Pentagon's deck of cards: Asked how the Pentagon decided to put its
most-wanted Iraqis on a set of playing cards, Franks explained its
genesis. He recalled that when his staff identified the most notorious
Iraqis the U.S. wanted to capture, "it just turned out that the number
happened to be about the same as a deck of cards. And so somebody said,
'Aha, this will be the ace of spades.'"

Capturing Saddam: Franks said he was not surprised that Saddam has not
been captured or killed. But he says he will eventually be found,
perhaps sooner than Osama bin laden.

"The capture or killing of Saddam Hussein will be a near term thing. And
I won't say that'll be within 19 or 43 days. ... I believe it is
inevitable."

Franks ended his interview with a less-than-optimistic note. "It's not
in the history of civilization for peace ever to reign. Never has in the
history of man. ... I doubt that we'll ever have a time when the world
will actually be at peace."

Copyright: Newsmax.com

--
"The penalty good men pay for indifference
to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.?
Plato

Posted by RONN @ 11/21/2003 09:29 AM EST


VOX"This thread will act as a central point to gather and document the chilling facts surrounding the many suspicious players and events of those dark days when the New World Order made their move and steered this "

Operation Northwoods
problem-reaction-solution

"On April 24, 2001 the Baltimore Sun and ABC News reported on a shocking, declassified Pentagon document, titled Operation Northwoods. In Operation Northwoods the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff called for hijacking jet airliners, attacking US military bases, blowing up US ships and wounding civilians in Miami, Florida and Washington, DC using paramilitary sniper teams.  Page eight of the formerly Top Secret Pentagon plan stated that “casualty lists in US Newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.”  The opening paragraph in the Baltimore Sun read “US leaders proposed in ’62 a secret plan to commit terrorist acts against Americans and blame Cuba to create a pretext for invasion.”

The Northwoods Document spells out the US Government's plan to frame innocent people for the shootings and bombings that the US Government was preparing to commit. Page 9 of the Northwoods Document states that after the Government carried out shootings and bombings in Washington DC that "the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government."

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-int.htm
http://www.public-action.com/911/northwds.html

PDF FILE (mirrored): northwoods doc.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/northwoods.pdf

The Northwoods document was obtained by the National Security Archive:
"an independent non-governmental research institute and library located at The George Washington University in Washington, D.C.  The Archive collects and publishes declassified documents acquired through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).  A tax-exempt public charity, the Archive receives no U.S. government funding; its budget is supported by publication royalties and donations from foundations and individuals."
http://www.nsa.gov/

George Bush, The CIA, Mind Control & Child Abuse May 5, 2003

From the Streets of Little Beirut Glen Yeadon On January 28, 2003, amid the furor of the impending war with Iraq the British press briefly reported on Operation Ore, the most thorough and comprehensive police investigation of crimes against children before being squashed by the Blair government. Besides implicating Rock guitarist Peter Townsend of the Who, the report claimed that senior members of Tony Blair's government were being investigated for pedophilia and the "enjoyment" of child-sex pornography. With the investigation reaching to senior members of his Government, Blair declared a news blackout on the story. Moreover, the British report was not the first such case reported. In fact, it followed on the heels of a report from Portugal.

On November 27, 2002, the press reported a scandal of pedophile ring run from a state orphanage. The Guardian reported that the scandal threatened to engulf diplomats, media personalities and senior politicians. Photographs of senior government officials with young boys from Lisbon's Casa Pia orphanage were among the evidence. More shocking however, were the revelations that systematic sexual abuse of children at the home had allegedly been going on for more than 20 years and had been known to police and other authorities for most of that time. On January 14, 2002, Insight Magazine reported the charges leveled by Ben Johnson against his employer Dyncorp, a major defense contractor. Johnson charged that officials and employees of Dyncorp were engaging in perverse, illegal and inhumane behavior and were purchasing illegal weapons, women, forged passports and participating in other immoral acts. Johnson had witnessed his supervisors and fellow employees buying 12- to 15-year-olds as sex slaves.

While prostitution is the world’s oldest profession, the global sex trade is big business. The impact of illegal immigrant traffic in Canada is estimated at between $120 million to $400 million per year accounting for approximately 8,000 to 16,000 people arriving in Canada per year illegally. The estimate is from Organized Crime Impact Study, prepared for the Solicitor General of Canada. The majority of the illegal immigrants are forced into prostitution and come from Vietnam and China. Once smuggled into Canada the young girls are sold into bondage throughout a North America network. Moreover, Canada is not alone. Young Russians and Ukrainian women that wish to immigrate to Israel are often smuggled into the country destitute and at the mercy of their pimp. More disgusting is the role the United States government plays in facilitating this global sex trade. Instead of banning the previously mentioned Dyncorp from further defense contracts, the regime of George W Bush rewards it in granting major contracts for the Iraqi war. Even more shameful is the wink and nod the state department grants the Saudis.

The Arabian Peninsula has long been known to be purchasers of slaves. Mostly the slaves came from India or Africa however, with the advent of the oil wealth the Saudis have became more selective and are known as high-end buyers. The Saudi Arabian Government continues to refuse to sign the United Nation’s treaty on slavery and extradition treaties. There have been several incidents in the past where the media has reported a slave of a Saudi prince brought into the United States escaped. The State Department then intervenes and returns the escaped slave to the Saudi prince and the incident forgotten. The State Department exempts the Saudi princes from normal custom procedures. A child slave bought by a Saudi prince can be delivered to his plane and allowed to depart without the required passport for the child. One fortunate victim that became entangled in the Saudi sex ring was the former Miss USA Shannon Marketic. She had been lured to Saudi Arabia by what she believed was legitimate modeling work. Being a high profile case she was returned to the United States and filed suit. The former Miss USA lost her lawsuit as the State department granted immunity to her abductors.

Many of the pictures of the young children peering out from posters and milk cartons that have disappeared in the United States have fallen victim to this global sex trade. They indeed may have been lucky for there is a much more sinister side to child molestation. In fact, it is undoubtedly the most macabre and hideous aspect to evolve out of the United States use of Nazi scientists, the CIA’s Project MK-ULTRA. This grotesque project of ghastly experiments in mind control evolved out of earlier CIA projects in search for a truth serum. The roots for such a project date back to the wartime OSS search for a truth serum. During the war, the OSS began a search for a truth serum to use on captured U-boat prisoners. The experiments were limited and the only drug they found to produce desirable results was cannabis. According to author Anthony Cave Brown in the Last Hero, the experiments were limited to testing on one person. Additionally Dr. George Estabrooks of Colgate University carried out experiments paralleling the Nazis brain washing methods by drugs and hypnosis.

Estabrooks connections with the army, CID, FBI and other agencies are still shrouded in secrecy. However, it seems that the doctor could not help but talk about his experiments occasionally and what is know of his work comes from his loose tongue. During the war, the allies had captured documents in the Nazis experiments on inmates of Dachau with mescaline and other psychedelics in a search for a truth serum. The doctor in charge of the Dachau experiments was Dr. Hubertus Strughold. Strughold was also involved in barbaric high altitude experiments on inmates of Dachau. Strughold was brought to the United States under the Project Paperclip and became America’s father of space medicine. His use of mind-altering drugs on inmates provided the foundation for the CIA’s research into truth serums and mind control. The United States first foray into truth serums started in 1947 as Project CHATTER initiated by the navy. The project was terminated in 1953. In 1949, at the Edgewood Arsenal the CIA began project Bluebird using Nazi scientists to find a truth serum. Project Bluebird evolved into Project Artichoke and eventually into MK-Ultra. MK-UTRA was much larger in focusing on mind control and the means to achieve it was not limited to drugs and psychedelics.

MK-ULTRA experiments including using hypnosis, lobotomy, electroshock, sensory deprivation, ESP, and drugs experiments in hypnosis, lobotomy, electroshock, sensory deprivation, ESP, drugs and sexual abuse. Ironically, the CIA’s first widespread use of sex came from a program to blackmail United States politicians conducted by Edwin Wilson. The political targets were enticed to live out their sexual fantasies in the flesh. With hidden cameras ready the unsuspecting politician would be filmed, which would later be used to blackmail him into supporting the agency’s projects and views. Wilson's skill in these matters dated back to the early 1950s, when he took over a network of homosexual and pedophile rings from CIA asset and McCarthy Committee counsel Roy Cohn. While MK-ULTRA focused primarily on the use of drugs for mind control other CIA projects evolved to use trauma to induce control or the victim’s mind such as Project Monarch. Project Monarch officially began in the early 1960s, although unofficially at a much earlier date. Monarch may have evolved out of MK-SEARCH subprojects such as SPELLBINDER, which was a program to create the Manchurian candidate or sleeper assassins that could be activated with code words.

MK-ULTRA still remains classified as top secret. Officially, the CIA refuses to acknowledge it. In the aftermath of Watergate, the CIA released voluminous documents under the Freedom of Information act on MK-ULTRA and other projects. Several good books soon followed the release. Perhaps, the closest admission of the program came in an interview of William Colby by Anton Chaitkin of the New Federalist. When directly asked what about MONARCH, Colby angry replied "We stopped that between the late 1960's and the early 1970's." Knowledge of Project MONARCH comes from its victims. The first to surface was Candy Jones, a model with the birth name of Jessica Wilcox. Jones apparently fit the physiological profile as to be one of the initial experiments of MK-ULTRA. Her story was told in the book The Control of Candy Jones.

The most publicized case is the story of Cathy O'Brien told in the book TRANCE Formation of America: The True Life Story of a ClA Slave. O'Brien is the only vocal and recovered survivor. Like many others, Cathy was introduced to the program by her perverted father. Cathy covers an almost unbelievable array of conspiratorial crime: forced prostitution (white slavery) with those in the upper echelons of world politics, covert assignments as a "drug mule" and courier. Another survivor, Paul Bonaci who survived two decades of torture under Project MONARCH has disclosed strong corroborating evidence of wide-scale crimes and corruption from the municipal/state level all the way up to the White House. He has testified about sexually abused males selected from Boy's Town in Nebraska and taken to nearby Offutt AFB. At Offutt, they were subjected to intense MONARCH programming, directed mainly by Commander Bill Plemmons and former Lt. Col. Michael Aquino. Monarch programming involves traumatizing the victim in order to create multiple personalities in the victim. Sexual molestation and the occult are standard tools for the Monarch programmer. There are several levels of Monarch programming. Alpha is regarded as general programming within the base personality. Beta programming or sexual programming eliminates all learned moral behavior and stimulates the primitive sexual instinct, devoid of inhibitions. Delta is known as killer programming.

Subjects are devoid of fear and are very systematic in carrying out their assignment. Self-destruct or suicide instructions are layered in at this level. . Other levels of programming generally concern some method of self-destruction or evasion if the victim was ever captured after completing their assignment. The initial stages of programming usually begin somewhere in the first six years of the victim’s life. Due to the trauma induced by electro-shock, sexual abuse and other methods the vicitms’ mind splits into alternate personalities to cope with the trauma. Formerly referred to as Multiple Personality Disorder, it is presently recognized as Dissociative Identity Disorder and is the basis for MONARCH programming. Further conditioning of the victim's mind is enhanced through hypnotism, double-bind coercion, pleasure-pain reversals, food, water, sleep and sensory deprivation, and with various drugs. In order to keep Project ULTRA and its associated projects secret the CIA segmented the research between several universities, hospitals and prisons. The Canadians are still coming to grips with the house of horrors found inside Dr. Cameron’s Montreal labs. Cameron’s research was sponsored by the CIA. The final stage of programming usually occurs on military bases to insure security.

Several bases are implicated with Monarch programming. Two bases have been exposed in the past by incidents Offutt and the Presidio in the 1980s. The Presidio case dates back as far as 1982, when a military doctor warned the army of the danger to children in its day care center. The army failed to follow its own regulations in allowing the children to go on field trips off base without the parents consent. On August14, 1984, the FBI and officers from the army’s criminal investigation division raided the home of Lt. Col. Michael Aquino looking for evidence of child molestation. The Presidio case attracted the attention of investigative reporter and radio talk show host, Mae Bruessell. During her investigation of the case, she received several death threats. Her daughter was killed in a car wreck that she attributed as a hit. Before concluding her investigation, Mae was struck with a fast onset of cancer. The reader should note the CIA has developed a fast acting cancer virus. Mae’s death may have been induced rather than from natural causes. Linked with both Offutt and the Presidio cases is Lt Colonel Michael Aquino. Aquino founded the Temple of Set, an offshoot of Anton LaVey's Church of Satan. He was attached to the DIA's Psychological Warfare Division and holds a top secret security clearance for his work in military intelligence and on classified psychological warfare. . Aquino is obsessed with Nazi pagan rituals. He officiated at SS black magic ceremonies held at Wewelsburg, the Castle once used by SS chief Heinrich Himmler to create an SS order of Teutonic Knights based on the Knights Templars. His hypnotic manipulation of people made him an ideal candidate for the position of Master Programmer. Aquino along with others was arrested in the Presidio case for child molesting. The evidence was overwhelming of their guilt however, to the dismay of the victim’s parents all charges were dropped. Aquino has developed training tapes on how to create a MONARCH slave and worked as a liaison between Government/Military Intelligence and various criminal organizations and occult groups in the distribution of MONARCH slaves. The dismissal of charges is common in such cases.

On February 7, 1987, the Washington Post ran an article about a case of possible kidnapping and child abuse. Washington D.C. police had arrest two men after observing them watching over several children that were described as very neglected. The children ran in age from 2 to 7 and were covered with insect bites and extremely dirty. Their subsequent investigation led to the Finders, a cult like commune. The adult males were Michael Houlihan and Douglas Ammerman. They led authorities to an old warehouse. Inside the warehouse police found color slides, photographs and photographic contact sheets. Some photos revealed children participating in blood letting cult rituals involving animals. Other documents described "blood rituals" and sexual orgies involving children, and an unsolved murder in which the Finders might be involved. Additional documents revealed detailed instructions for obtaining children for unspecified purposes. The instructions included the impregnation of female members of the community, purchasing children, trading and kidnapping. Several telex messages were also found in the warehouse. One such telex ordered the purchase of two children in Hong Kong to be arranged through a contact in the Chinese Embassy. There was a file called "Pentagon Break-in," and references to activities in Moscow, Hong Kong, China, Malaysia, North Vietnam, North Korea, Africa, London, Germany, "Europe" and the Bahamas. Other documents identified interests in high-tech transfers to the United Kingdom, numerous properties under the control of the Finders, interest in terrorism, explosives, and the evasion of law enforcement. The warehouse also had a video room, apparently used for indoctrination. All the findings by the local police were verified by US. Customs officials. The US Custom officials soon ordered a full investigation and obtained search warrants for various locations. The investigation brought in the FBI as well.

Nevertheless, this was as far as the investigation ever got. All law enforcement agencies involved including the local police, the US Custom’s officials and the FBI were ordered to halt their investigations by the Department of Justice on grounds of national security. The matter was turned over to the CIA an "internal security matter," since the "Finders" is and has been a domestic and international covert operation of the Central Intelligence Agency. The investigations were immediately halted, the evidence suppressed and the abused children returned to their handlers, who had been arrested. To date the only media outlet that has published the details behind the halting of the investigation has been US News and World Reports. There have been other reports suggestive of a connection between child abuse and top officials. On June 29, 1989, the Washington Times, shook the Bush White House to its very roots with the front page headline "Call Boys Took Midnight Tour of White House.'' The paper reported, ``A homosexual prostitution ring is under investigation by federal and District authorities and includes among its clients key officials of the Reagan and Bush administrations, military officers, congressional aides and U.S. and foreign businessmen with close ties to Washington's political elite.'' At the center of the scandal was Craig Spence, a Republican powerbroker known for his lavish ``power cocktail'' parties. Among the rumors circulating was a rumor indicating that over 200 of Washington’s elite had used the call boy service. Spence’s entire mansion was covered with two way mirrors, hidden microphones and cameras.

The White House including President Bush refused to answer questions or discuss the incident. At the same time, another story implicating the President in child abuse was breaking in the heart of the country. The story centered on the failure of the Franklin Community Credit Union in Omaha. For roughly a decade stories linking Larry King the director of Franklin to child molestation had surfaced in and around the Omaha area. The failure of the Franklin Credit Union began to expose the murky past of King that had been shrouded in fog. Besides being involved in the illegal Iran-Contra scandal, rumors of King’s involvement with child abuse came forth. King was one of the rising stars in the Republican Party. He sung the national anthem at the national convention in Dallas. He was known for the lavish parties he held including the one at the famed South Fork Ranch from the TV series Dallas. King held parties around the country including Washington D.C. Always present at these parties were young children of both sexes from King’s stable of prostitutes. For years, rumors had surfaced about child abuse, drugs and King in the Omaha area. King had an ample supply of young boys from Boys Town, others he procured from the streets of Omaha. Police from as far as Kansas City were aware of his activities. Nevertheless, in Omaha King was protected. The chief of police in both Omaha and Des Moines, Iowa were frequent guests at King’s parties in Omaha. King had the backing of Omaha’s elite behind him including the staunchly conservative local paper. Indeed King wielded enough power to even shut down an investigation by the state attorney general under Democratic Governor Exxon. King even had an ally in the FBI officer in charge of the Omaha office. Moreover, there were abundant rumors that one did not want to incur King’s displeasure.

Several murders were rumored to have been committed by King to protect his child molestation and drug businesses. In fact, at least fifteen mysterious deaths are connected with the Franklin case. It was clear from the beginning that both the local and federal grand juries were being used as a tool to cover up the child abuse surrounding King and the Franklin case. Likewise, the FBI was part of the cover up. Several of the victims recanted their testimony after being threaten by the FBI. The victims that refused to recant were charged with perjury and sentenced to prison. It was only with the failure of Franklin Credit Union that the whole story surrounding Larry King came out due to one man’s dogged determination. John DeCamp, a former senator from the Nebraska unicameral legislator pursued the case relentlessly in the legislator. In fact, DeCamp was sternly warned by his friend, the former CIA director William Colby to give up the case before he met with a death. Shortly after warning DeCamp, Colby was found dead. Although Colby’s death was attributed to accidental drowning it was more likely he was murdered. Instead of giving up his investigation and determination to uncover the truth about King’s pedophile ring DeCamp chose the only remaining option with the blessing of Colby. He wrote a book about the case: The Franklin Cover Up. Once published, DeCamp’s death would only call more attention to the Franklin case. In page after page, DeCamp describes the gruesome lives of the victims of King’s pedophile sex ring. Some of the cases preceded the Franklin failure by over a decade. Many of the children described satanic rituals that they were forced to attend, some of which involved sacrificing infants and young children. Children attending these sacrifices were warned that if they ever told anyone they would be the next to be sacrificed. In addition, they told of being flown to locations around the country in King’s private plane to parties where they were expected to take part in any sexual acts demanded of them. Why did such a case in the center of America’s heartland prompt such a high level source as the former CIA director to warn his friend? Moreover, why was there so many mysterious deaths connected with the case?

While the case made the headlines in regional papers, it never attracted the attention of the national media. Most people have never heard of Larry King. The answer to the questions lies in King’s connection to the top power center of the Republican Party and the Bush administration. Both Bush’s attorney general and secretary of treasure had to be aware that the FBI was involved in a massive cover up in Omaha. Even the flight logs of King’s airplane had disappeared entangling the FAA in the cover up. Not only did King’s pedophile ring lead to the top echelons of the Republican Party it also lead to the top of the Bush administration and the Oval Office. Several of the children in Kings prostitution ring recount stories of seeing George Bush at some of King’s Parties. While an outsider would not suspect anything amiss, the children in the ring would know what was taking place. At least one of King’s young prostitutes reported that at one party, she saw George Bush pay King and then depart with a young black man. The President was a pedophile and involved in a pedophile ring, the story had to be squashed at all cost. King is currently serving fifteen years for the failure of the Franklin Credit Union. At least two of his victims have been wrongly imprisoned for refusing to recant their testimony. Meanwhile pedophiles like George Bush are free and able to abuse other children all in the name of national security.
http://www.spiritone.com/~gdy52150/littleboys.html

Mike James in Frankfurt: March 11 2003
"NATO boss and Blair government insider Lord Robertson has threatened to sue Scotland's leading independent newspaper over internet allegations that he not only used his influence as a Freemason to procure a gun licence for child killer Thomas Hamilton, but was also a member of a clandestine paedophile ring reportedly set up by Hamilton for the British elite.
On 13 March 1996, Hamilton, armed with four hand-guns, opened fire on a junior school class, killing 16 children and one teacher before turning the gun on himself, shattering forever the idyllic 13th century Scottish town of Dunblane.

The controversy is certain to topple the Blair government, which has already issued a D-Notice to gag the press from revealing the names of known paedophiles within the British executive, including at least two senior ministers; and the case highlights the government's
antipathy toward the Sunday Herald and its brand of independent journalism that has, among other things, exposed the role played by the domestic security agency, MI5, in helping the IRA to carry out terrorist atrocities."
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/blair_protection.html

Robertson considers action over web allegation
http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=290762003

Alleged Pedophiles at Helm of Britain's War Machine
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/alleged_pedophiles.html

Call to lift veil of secrecy over Dunblane
http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardianpolitics/story/0,3605,895056,00.html

MP aide facing porn charge
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2002400885,00.html

Child porn arrests 'too slow'
http://www.sundayherald.com/30813

Tony Blair's aide arrested over child pornography
http://www.hostultra.com/~profreedom/blairsaid.html

Don't look now
http://www.observer.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903,877634,00.html

"September 12, 2002—Who has more to gain by lying about child sexual abuse, the child, or the adult abuser?

The obvious answer to that question is turned on its ear in an explosive, but little known, book by former Nebraska state Senator John W. DeCamp, The Franklin Cover-Up: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska. First published in 1992 with an updated edition in 1996, this book has it all—corporate corruption, white-collar thievery, justice denied, mysterious deaths of those who knew too much, ritualistic sexual abuse of children, both male and female, a miserably failed child adoption/foster program, and, at every turn, big names in Nebraska city and state government—and household political names reaching all the way up to the White House."
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Books_Reviews/Hart091202/hart091202.html

Posted by network @ 11/21/2003 01:49 PM EST


- Purpose

The purpose of the expose' of the Twentieth Century is to prove the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, ordered by the Jesuit General and executed by Pope Paul VI, was carried out by "the American Pope", Francis Cardinal Spellman. Spellman, being the Archbishop of New York, was "the American Military Vicar" and therefore used his most obedient soldiers - certain Knights of Malta, Shriner Freemasons, Knights of Columbus and Mafia Dons - in carrying out his orders from Rome.

The single reason for the President's assassination was his interference with the purpose of the Jesuits' Fourteenth Amendment American Empire created in 1868. That purpose was to restore and maintain the worldwide Temporal (political) Power of that Jesuit Creation of 1870 - the "infallible" Pope. In resisting the Pope's Temporal Power, he threatened the monopoly of the Jesuits' Federal Reserve Bank by enacting Executive Order 11110 (4 June 1963) thereby injecting into the economy nearly five billion dollars (4.7) in interest-free "United States Notes", only to be recalled the day after his burial.

The President also attempted to break the foremost international intelligence arm of the Vatican's Jesuits - the evil Central Intelligence Agency - "into a thousand pieces." In 1963 the CIA was manned by many of Hitler's old warriors - the Jesuit-controlled Nazi SS - turned "cold warriors". According to the great Frenchman, Edmond Paris, in his The Secret History of the Jesuits, it was the Jesuit Bernhardt Staempfle who wrote Hitler's Mein Kampf. This fact is further confirmed by one of the founders of the Nazi Party, Roman Catholic Otto Strasser, in his revealing book, Hitler and I. It was Roman Catholic Hitler who said of the Roman Catholic Himmler having modeled the SS after the Jesuit Order,

"I can see Himmler as our Ignatius of Loyola."

And lastly, one of the main posts of the feared SD, the Central Security Service of the SS (after which the American CIA would be modeled with the help of the repatriated Nazi General, Reinhard Gehlen), was manned by a priest - a former teacher of the evil Council of Trent at the Court of Bavaria, one of the Jesuit General's favorites, a superior officer of the SS and the uncle of Heinrich Himmler - the Jesuit Himmler, who controlled Hitler's every move through Martin Bormann!

Secreted out of Europe through the Vatican's Ratlines, these murderers escaped their rightful punishment as war criminals who, during the Jesuit Crusade in Europe and Russia, killed millions of Russian Orthodox People and Jewish People pursuant to the Jesuits' evil Council of Trent, which, after condemning freedom of conscience and freedom of the press, concluded with these words:

"Accursed be all heretics. ACCURSED!! ACCURSED!!"

Lastly, President Kennedy began to end the Vatican's hoax known as "the Cold War", the American CIA and Russian KGB having secretly worked together since World War II. He also began to end that Jesuit Inquisition in Vietnam, as its future highpoint would be "Operation Phoenix", the CIA mass-murder of 60,000 Vietnamese "in cold blood" according to its Director, William E. Colby. The President interfering with Rome's Holy Office of the Inquisition could not be tolerated! Millions of "heretic" Buddhists were to be exterminated, the international drug trade would explode, American patriotism and liberty would further be destroyed and Vietnam would be reunited under another communist military dictator loyal to the Pope - like Stalin, like Chairman Mao, like Castro, like George H. W. Bush and son -, Ho Chi Minh.

Waged under the guise of "fighting godless communism", Cardinal Spellman championed America's most disastrous conflict known as "Spelly's War" overseen by Spelly's General, the Roman Catholic and CFR member, William C. Westmoreland. (Remember, according to Col. L. Fletcher Prouty in his JFK, the forced movement of over 600,000 Roman Catholics on U.S. Navy transport vessels from North Vietnam into South Vietnam was "one of the root causes of the Vietnam War." The arch-Catholic Secretary of the Navy responsible for implementing that Jesuit-agitation was the Supreme Knight of the Knights of Columbus, Francis P. Matthews. Knight Matthew's Master was America's "Military Vicar", Francis Cardinal Spellman. Later, Spellman made several visits to the war-front calling the American troops "the soldiers of Christ", fighting the Pope's Crusade against "godless Jew Communism"!) The outcome was 58,000 dead, 80,000 post-war suicides and a 220 billion dollar debt to the Jesuits' Federal Reserve Bank.

All these acts of President Kennedy were proper assertions of national sovereignty and therefore infringed on the Pope's Temporal Power. As the "infallible" Vicar of Christ and thus, "the Universal Monarch of the World", the Pope, through the religious, political and financial power of the Jesuit Order, fully intended, then and now, to ultimately rule all nations through his loyal kings and dictators from Solomon's rebuilt Temple in Jerusalem. For when the Pope is crowned during his coronation these words among others (having never been taught to us in the Public Schools) are spoken:

"Take thou the tiara adorned with the triple crown,
and know that thou art the father of princes and kings,
and art the governor of the world."

Thomas Aquinas, Rome's "Angelic Doctor" wrote in his Summa Theologica in 1272:

"The Pope, by Divine Right,
hath spiritual and Temporal Power,
as supreme king of the World: ..."

Lucius Ferraris wrote in his Bibliothica Prompta (1763), which has been adopted as a standard of Roman Catholic law, as follows:

On account of the excellence of his supreme dignity, he is called Bishop of Bishops, Ordinary of Ordinaries, universal Bishop of the Church, Bishop or Diocesan of the world, divine Monarch, supreme Emperor and King of Kings.

Roman Catholic Priest and editor, David S. Phelan paraphrased those words when he wrote in the Western Watchman, June 27, 1912:

"...Why, if the government of the United States were at war with the Church, we would say tomorrow, To Hell with the government of the United States; and if the church and all the governments of the world were at war, we would say: - To Hell with all the governments of the world ...Why is it the Pope has such tremendous power? Why the Pope is the ruler of the World. All the emperors, all the kings, all the princes, all the presidents of the world are as these alter boys of mine: ..."

Therefore, for challenging the Pope's Temporal Power, in attempting to thwart Rome's grand design against the peoples of the world, John F. Kennedy, America's first Roman Catholic President, was brutally murdered in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963, by the soldiers of Francis Cardinal Spellman within the FBI, the CIA, the Secret Service, Military Intelligence and the Mafia.

On September 11, 2001 this same Intelligence Network, overseen by New York Archbishop Edward Cardinal Egan being under the supervision of Jesuit General Peter-Hans Kolvenbach, attacked and destroyed the Twin Towers of New York's World Trade Center and partially destroyed the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. These acts of high treason against the American People have now justified our present Crusade against Islam, surnamed "the war against terrorism", and heartily endorsed by the Pope's Masonic Jewish Zionists to the detriment of the beloved, racially Jewish People in Israel. This "war on terrorism" is to the exclusion of notorious Jesuit-trained terrorists and mass murderers such as Fidel Castro of communist Cuba and Gerry Adams of Ireland's Irish Republican Army. Why?

Posted by Jon Ken @ 11/21/2003 03:04 PM EST


Then:
On January 17, 1961, in his farewell address to the nation, President Dwight D. Eisenhower spoke to the country, and to his successor, John F. Kennedy.

"The conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience," said Eisenhower. "We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex."

JFK rejected Operation Northwoods... the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, HIJACKING PLANES, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even ORCHESTRATING VIOLENT TERRORISM IN U.S. CITIES. http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html

In his memoirs, Premier Nikita Krushchev quotes the younger Kennedy as saying: "The President is in a grave situation... We are under pressure from our military to use force against Cuba... If the situation continues much longer, the President is not sure that the military will not overthrow him and seize power." http://www.turnerlearning.com/cnn/coldwar/cuba/cuba_re3.html

He alienated the arms industry by proposing, in agreement with Krushchev, major long-range cuts in defense spending, and the oil industry by demanding cuts in the oil depletion allowance... he had already ordered the first withdrawal of troops when he was killed, and had planned major withdrawals by 1965. [Reversed by LBJ]http://www.geocities.com/mdmorrissey/menwho1.htm

Now:
"What makes the new Bush administration different from previous wealthy cabinets is that so many of the officials have links to the same industry - oil." http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1138009.stm

In his vow to fight terrorism - to "win the first war of the 21st century" - President Bush has pledged "whatever it takes, whatever it costs...." If the administration's projections are correct, in just a few years that cost will near a half-trillion dollars a year. http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0213/p02s03-uspo.html

Gen. Tommy Franks says that if the United States is hit with a weapon of mass destruction that inflicts large casualties, the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/11/20/185048.shtml

Posted by MR. ELEVEN @ 11/21/2003 03:05 PM EST


The Kennedy assassination marked the end of counting people's votes.

http://www.votescam.com/

Posted by sammy @ 11/21/2003 04:51 PM EST


http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/JFK/jfk.html

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/serrano.html

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/CRASH/JFK_JR/jj.html

Posted by sammy @ 11/21/2003 05:31 PM EST


vox this part of an interview with

CodeWarrior

he works for http://www.boycott-riaa.com/
main site for peer guardian http://www.peerguardian.net/

This is a battle that is more important than filesharing it is about the control of media, i like how he says everytime you go into a website you are breaking the dmca because you have no prior consent to download the page.

he says in part

“It's not negative, it's being realistic. There are lots of people here in the states, and I am not kidding you about this, who are afraid to write emails, talk on the phone, or express their opposition on bulletin boards, for fear of being targeted by the FBI, Homeland Security, or other government organizations.
If I may, let me reference one site in particular. Cryptome.org is run by a man named John Young. He has had the site up for seven years. The other day, two FBI agents made a visit to his home to"have a little talk with him". They acknowledged nothing on his site was illegal, but asked a lot of questions about the funding of his site, who visits his site, etc..
Mr. Young said that it was clear to him, this was an attempt at intimidation. The agents told him that he was to report any "gut level" feelings that someone may be going to use information from his site to endanger the United States.
Mr. Young advised them he was going to publish their names on his site and the fact they paid this little visit to him. They were pretty upset at him, and now, he has placed a freedom of information act request with the FBI to find out everything they are keeping in a file on him.
There is the real fear here that if you become visible, speak out and oppose the government, that a "file" will be opened up on you, and you will be watched and monitored. Is this really a free nation if people live in this kind of fear?

My point is that we are already heading down that dark road.”

http://www.peerguardian.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=1977&hl=

I didn't post the whole interview per their request and also to long for here.

You have to get a log in name and password to post in the forms at peer guardian but this program can be used for security. If you agree with filesharing or not they are spying on you. They block some FBI and some department of Justices also. I have been hit by both. They are willing to put in IPs you think should be blocked and are for stopping government control of the media. We all know here that is the case. give it a shot and log in. maybe people here could give some good input for them. I,ve been hit just by simply going into web pages.

This might seem out of place in this form but they can coverup anything with the controll of the media. How would you like to be declared a terrorist just for posting in a website. This nazi style leadership has got to go. BAMN

Their are more than 60 million downloaders watching what happens here . Everyone should be concerned

Posted by revenger @ 11/21/2003 06:19 PM EST


The History Channel had excellent shows on all week from the video- "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" this is an altogther view than the goverment's one man- one "MAGIC" bullet STORY....glad to see this article.

Posted by dotconnectr @ 11/21/2003 07:25 PM EST


connecting the dots:

This article appears in the August 8, 2003 issue of Executive Intelligence Review. See the companion article, "My Unique Role in the Americas," and also "Synarchism, the Spanish Falange, and the Nazis."
A Short Definition of Synarchism
by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

"Synarchism" is a name adopted during the Twentieth Century for an occult freemasonic sect, known as the Martinists, based on worship of the tradition of the Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte. During the interval from the early 1920s through 1945, it was officially classed by U.S.A. and other nations' intelligence services under the file name of "Synarchism: Nazi/Communist," so defined because of its deploying simultaneously both ostensibly opposing pro-communist and extreme right-wing forces for encirclement of a targetted government. Twentieth-Century and later fascist movements, like most terrorist movements, are all Synarchist creations.
Synarchism was the central feature of the organization of the fascist governments of Italy, Germany, Spain, and Vichy and Laval France, during that period, and was also spread as a Spanish channel of the Nazi Party, through Mexico, throughout Central and South America. The PAN party of Mexico was born as an outgrowth of this infiltration. It is typified by the followers of the late Leo Strauss and Alexandre Kojève today.

This occult freemasonic conspiracy, is found among both nominally left-wing and also extreme right-wing factions such as the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal, the Mont Pelerin Society, and American Enterprise Institute and Hudson Institute, and the so-called integrist far right inside the Catholic clergy. The underlying authority behind these cults is a contemporary network of private banks of that medieval Venetian model known as fondi. The Synarchist Banque Worms conspiracy of the wartime 1940s, is merely typical of the role of such banking interests operating behind sundry fascist governments of that period.

The Synarchists originated in fact among the immediate circles of Napoleon Bonaparte; veteran officers of Napoleon's campaigns spread the cult's practice around the world. G.W.F. Hegel, a passionate admirer of Bonaparte's image as Emperor, was the first to supply a fascist historical doctrine of the state. Nietzsche's writings supplied Hegel's theory the added doctrine of the beast-man-created Dionysiac terror of Twentieth-Century fascist movements and regimes. The most notable fascist ideologues of post-World War II academia are Chicago University's Leo Strauss, who was the inspiration of today's U.S. neo-conservative ideologues, and Strauss's Paris co-thinker Alexandre Kojève.

Posted by brian @ 11/21/2003 11:05 PM EST


The Bush connection, http://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/dead_kennedys/161963.html

Posted by totse @ 11/22/2003 11:19 AM EST


From http://www.whatreallyhappened.com this morning, http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/executiveorder11110.htm

Posted by totse @ 11/22/2003 11:22 AM EST


To all Vox readers: The following is a lucid commentary on how left wing idealogue Noam Chomsky colludes with right wing establishment to bury the truth about the JFK assination. Ask yourself why? Understand from a reasonable perspective, this apparent contradiction can only be reconciled within the context of Hegelian logic. The right/left dichotomy is just a propagandistic tool used by powerful, megalomaniacal, financial oligarchs to dupe the masses. It effectively focuses public scrutiny on false, illusionary targets and thus, maintains the veil of cover these sick creatures need to maintain their system of top down control. Don't count on establishment academicians, pundits and statist propaganda organs like CNN and Fox News to ever blow their cover. Instead, keep reading vox, exploring the internet and drilling truth into the heads of those too constrained by an emotional dependence on the status quo to ever figure it out. Also, understand this forum isn't some sort of intellectual paintball war or color by numbers hobby horse. Its the real thing, so take some initiative and responsibility and do something socially constructive. As vox says "know your enemy and fight the big fight."
Why Care About JFK? By Mike Parenti 1996-From Dirty Truths

The left critics argue that people who are concerned about the JFK assassination are romanticizing Kennedy and squandering valuable energy. Chomsky claims that the Nazi-like appeals of rightist propagandists have a counterpart on the Left: "It's the conspiracy business. Hang around California, for example, and the left has just been torn to shreds because they see CIA conspiracies . . . secret governments [behind] the Kennedy assassination. This kind of stuff has just wiped out a large part of the left" (Against the Current 56, 1993). Chomsky offers no evidence to support this bizarre statement.

The left critics fear that people will be distracted or misled into thinking well of Kennedy. Cockburn argues that Kennedy was nothing more than a servant of the corporate class, so who cares how he was killed (Nation 3/9/92 and 5/18/92). The left critics' hatred of Kennedy clouds their judgment about the politcal significance of his murder. They mistake the low political value of the victim with the high political importance of the assassination, its implications for democracy, and the way it exposes the gangster nature of the state.

In 1894 Captain Alfred Dreyfus was a conservative militarist. Clemenceau once conjectured that if the man's name had not been Dreyfus, he would have been an anti-Dreyfusard. Does that mean that the political struggle waged around l'affaire Dreyfus was a waste of time? The issue quickly became larger than Dreyfus, drawn between Right and Left, between those who stood with the army and the anti-Semites and those who stood with the republic and justice.

Likewise Benigno Aquino, a member of the privileged class in the Philippines, promised no great structural changes, being even more conservative than Kennedy. Does this mean the Filipino people should have dismissed the conspiracy that led to his assassination as an event of no great moment, an internal ruling-class affair? Instead, they used it as ammunition to expose the hated Marcos regime.

Archbishop Romero of El Salvador was a member of the Salvadoran aristocracy. He could not have risen to the top of the church hierarchy otherwise. But after he began voicing critical remarks about the war and concerned comments about the poor, he was assassinated. If he had not been murdered, I doubt that Salvadoran history would have been much different. Does this mean that solidarity groups in this country and El Salvador should not have tried to make his murder an issue that revealed the homicidal gangster nature of the Salvadoran state? (I posed these questions to Chomsky in an exchange in Z Magazine, but in his response, he did not address them.)

Instead of seizing the opportunity, some left writers condescendingly ascribe a host of emotional needs to those who are concerned about the assassination cover-up. According to Max Holland, a scribe who seems to be on special assignment to repudiate the JFK conspiracy: "The nation is gripped by a myth . . . divorced from reality," and "Americans refuse to accept their own history." In Z Magazine (10/92) Chomsky argued that "at times of general malaise and social breakdown, it is not uncommon for millenarian movements to arise." He saw two such movements in 1992: the response to Ross Perot and what he called the "Kennedy revival" or "Camelot revival." Though recognizing that the audiences differ, he lumps them together as "the JFK-Perot enthusiasms." Public interest in the JFK assassination, he says, stems from a "Camelot yearning" and the "yearning for a lost Messiah."

I, for one, witnessed evidence of a Perot movement involving millions of people but I saw no evidence of a Kennedy revival, certainly no millenarian longing for Camelot or a "lost Messiah." However, there has been a revived interest in the Kennedy assassination, which is something else. Throughout the debate, Chomsky repeatedly assumes that those who have been troubled about the assassination must be admirers of Kennedy. In fact, some are, but many are not. Kennedy was killed in 1963; people who today are in their teens, twenties, thirties, and forties - most Americans - were not old enough to have developed a political attachment to him.

The left critics psychologize about our illusions, our false dreams, our longings for Messiahs and father figures, or inability to face unpleasant realities the way they can. They deliver patronizing admonitions about our "conspiracy captivation" and "Camelot yearnings." They urge us not to escape into fantasy. They are the cognoscenti who guide us and out-left us on the JFK assassination, a subject about which they know next to nothing and whose significance they have been unable to grasp. Having never read the investigative literature, they dismiss the investigators as irrelevant or irrational. To cloak their own position with intellectual respectability, they fall back on an unpracticed structuralism.

It is neither "Kennedy worship" nor "Camelot yearnings" that motivates our inquiry, but a desire to fight back against manipulative and malignant institutions so that we might begin to develop a system of accountable rule worthy of the name democracy.

Posted by brian @ 11/22/2003 02:15 PM EST


To all Vox readers: The following is a lucid commentary on how left wing idealogue Noam Chomsky colludes with right wing establishment to bury the truth about the JFK assination. Ask yourself why? Understand from a reasonable perspective, this apparent contradiction can only be reconciled within the context of Hegelian logic. The right/left dichotomy is just a propagandistic tool used by powerful, megalomaniacal, financial oligarchs to dupe the masses. It effectively focuses public scrutiny on false, illusionary targets and thus, maintains the veil of cover these sick creatures need to maintain their system of top down control. Don't count on establishment academicians, pundits and statist propaganda organs like CNN and Fox News to ever blow their cover. Instead, keep reading vox, exploring the internet and drilling truth into the heads of those too constrained by an emotional dependence on the status quo to ever figure it out. Also, understand this forum isn't some sort of intellectual paintball war or color by numbers hobby horse. Its the real thing, so take some initiative and responsibility and do something socially constructive. As vox says "know your enemy and fight the big fight."
Why Care About JFK? By Mike Parenti 1996-From Dirty Truths

The left critics argue that people who are concerned about the JFK assassination are romanticizing Kennedy and squandering valuable energy. Chomsky claims that the Nazi-like appeals of rightist propagandists have a counterpart on the Left: "It's the conspiracy business. Hang around California, for example, and the left has just been torn to shreds because they see CIA conspiracies . . . secret governments [behind] the Kennedy assassination. This kind of stuff has just wiped out a large part of the left" (Against the Current 56, 1993). Chomsky offers no evidence to support this bizarre statement.

The left critics fear that people will be distracted or misled into thinking well of Kennedy. Cockburn argues that Kennedy was nothing more than a servant of the corporate class, so who cares how he was killed (Nation 3/9/92 and 5/18/92). The left critics' hatred of Kennedy clouds their judgment about the politcal significance of his murder. They mistake the low political value of the victim with the high political importance of the assassination, its implications for democracy, and the way it exposes the gangster nature of the state.

In 1894 Captain Alfred Dreyfus was a conservative militarist. Clemenceau once conjectured that if the man's name had not been Dreyfus, he would have been an anti-Dreyfusard. Does that mean that the political struggle waged around l'affaire Dreyfus was a waste of time? The issue quickly became larger than Dreyfus, drawn between Right and Left, between those who stood with the army and the anti-Semites and those who stood with the republic and justice.

Likewise Benigno Aquino, a member of the privileged class in the Philippines, promised no great structural changes, being even more conservative than Kennedy. Does this mean the Filipino people should have dismissed the conspiracy that led to his assassination as an event of no great moment, an internal ruling-class affair? Instead, they used it as ammunition to expose the hated Marcos regime.

Archbishop Romero of El Salvador was a member of the Salvadoran aristocracy. He could not have risen to the top of the church hierarchy otherwise. But after he began voicing critical remarks about the war and concerned comments about the poor, he was assassinated. If he had not been murdered, I doubt that Salvadoran history would have been much different. Does this mean that solidarity groups in this country and El Salvador should not have tried to make his murder an issue that revealed the homicidal gangster nature of the Salvadoran state? (I posed these questions to Chomsky in an exchange in Z Magazine, but in his response, he did not address them.)

Instead of seizing the opportunity, some left writers condescendingly ascribe a host of emotional needs to those who are concerned about the assassination cover-up. According to Max Holland, a scribe who seems to be on special assignment to repudiate the JFK conspiracy: "The nation is gripped by a myth . . . divorced from reality," and "Americans refuse to accept their own history." In Z Magazine (10/92) Chomsky argued that "at times of general malaise and social breakdown, it is not uncommon for millenarian movements to arise." He saw two such movements in 1992: the response to Ross Perot and what he called the "Kennedy revival" or "Camelot revival." Though recognizing that the audiences differ, he lumps them together as "the JFK-Perot enthusiasms." Public interest in the JFK assassination, he says, stems from a "Camelot yearning" and the "yearning for a lost Messiah."

I, for one, witnessed evidence of a Perot movement involving millions of people but I saw no evidence of a Kennedy revival, certainly no millenarian longing for Camelot or a "lost Messiah." However, there has been a revived interest in the Kennedy assassination, which is something else. Throughout the debate, Chomsky repeatedly assumes that those who have been troubled about the assassination must be admirers of Kennedy. In fact, some are, but many are not. Kennedy was killed in 1963; people who today are in their teens, twenties, thirties, and forties - most Americans - were not old enough to have developed a political attachment to him.

The left critics psychologize about our illusions, our false dreams, our longings for Messiahs and father figures, or inability to face unpleasant realities the way they can. They deliver patronizing admonitions about our "conspiracy captivation" and "Camelot yearnings." They urge us not to escape into fantasy. They are the cognoscenti who guide us and out-left us on the JFK assassination, a subject about which they know next to nothing and whose significance they have been unable to grasp. Having never read the investigative literature, they dismiss the investigators as irrelevant or irrational. To cloak their own position with intellectual respectability, they fall back on an unpracticed structuralism.

It is neither "Kennedy worship" nor "Camelot yearnings" that motivates our inquiry, but a desire to fight back against manipulative and malignant institutions so that we might begin to develop a system of accountable rule worthy of the name democracy.

Posted by brian @ 11/22/2003 02:16 PM EST


To all Vox readers: The following is a lucid commentary on how left wing idealogue Noam Chomsky colludes with right wing establishment to bury the truth about the JFK assination. Ask yourself why? Understand from a reasonable perspective, this apparent contradiction can only be reconciled within the context of Hegelian logic. The right/left dichotomy is just a propagandistic tool used by powerful, megalomaniacal, financial oligarchs to dupe the masses. It effectively focuses public scrutiny on false, illusionary targets and thus, maintains the veil of cover these sick creatures need to maintain their system of top down control. Don't count on establishment academicians, pundits and statist propaganda organs like CNN and Fox News to ever blow their cover. Instead, keep reading vox, exploring the internet and drilling truth into the heads of those too constrained by an emotional dependence on the status quo to ever figure it out. Also, understand this forum isn't some sort of intellectual paintball war or color by numbers hobby horse. Its the real thing, so take some initiative and responsibility and do something socially constructive. As vox says "know your enemy and fight the big fight."
Why Care About JFK? By Mike Parenti 1996-From Dirty Truths

The left critics argue that people who are concerned about the JFK assassination are romanticizing Kennedy and squandering valuable energy. Chomsky claims that the Nazi-like appeals of rightist propagandists have a counterpart on the Left: "It's the conspiracy business. Hang around California, for example, and the left has just been torn to shreds because they see CIA conspiracies . . . secret governments [behind] the Kennedy assassination. This kind of stuff has just wiped out a large part of the left" (Against the Current 56, 1993). Chomsky offers no evidence to support this bizarre statement.

The left critics fear that people will be distracted or misled into thinking well of Kennedy. Cockburn argues that Kennedy was nothing more than a servant of the corporate class, so who cares how he was killed (Nation 3/9/92 and 5/18/92). The left critics' hatred of Kennedy clouds their judgment about the politcal significance of his murder. They mistake the low political value of the victim with the high political importance of the assassination, its implications for democracy, and the way it exposes the gangster nature of the state.

In 1894 Captain Alfred Dreyfus was a conservative militarist. Clemenceau once conjectured that if the man's name had not been Dreyfus, he would have been an anti-Dreyfusard. Does that mean that the political struggle waged around l'affaire Dreyfus was a waste of time? The issue quickly became larger than Dreyfus, drawn between Right and Left, between those who stood with the army and the anti-Semites and those who stood with the republic and justice.

Likewise Benigno Aquino, a member of the privileged class in the Philippines, promised no great structural changes, being even more conservative than Kennedy. Does this mean the Filipino people should have dismissed the conspiracy that led to his assassination as an event of no great moment, an internal ruling-class affair? Instead, they used it as ammunition to expose the hated Marcos regime.

Archbishop Romero of El Salvador was a member of the Salvadoran aristocracy. He could not have risen to the top of the church hierarchy otherwise. But after he began voicing critical remarks about the war and concerned comments about the poor, he was assassinated. If he had not been murdered, I doubt that Salvadoran history would have been much different. Does this mean that solidarity groups in this country and El Salvador should not have tried to make his murder an issue that revealed the homicidal gangster nature of the Salvadoran state? (I posed these questions to Chomsky in an exchange in Z Magazine, but in his response, he did not address them.)

Instead of seizing the opportunity, some left writers condescendingly ascribe a host of emotional needs to those who are concerned about the assassination cover-up. According to Max Holland, a scribe who seems to be on special assignment to repudiate the JFK conspiracy: "The nation is gripped by a myth . . . divorced from reality," and "Americans refuse to accept their own history." In Z Magazine (10/92) Chomsky argued that "at times of general malaise and social breakdown, it is not uncommon for millenarian movements to arise." He saw two such movements in 1992: the response to Ross Perot and what he called the "Kennedy revival" or "Camelot revival." Though recognizing that the audiences differ, he lumps them together as "the JFK-Perot enthusiasms." Public interest in the JFK assassination, he says, stems from a "Camelot yearning" and the "yearning for a lost Messiah."

I, for one, witnessed evidence of a Perot movement involving millions of people but I saw no evidence of a Kennedy revival, certainly no millenarian longing for Camelot or a "lost Messiah." However, there has been a revived interest in the Kennedy assassination, which is something else. Throughout the debate, Chomsky repeatedly assumes that those who have been troubled about the assassination must be admirers of Kennedy. In fact, some are, but many are not. Kennedy was killed in 1963; people who today are in their teens, twenties, thirties, and forties - most Americans - were not old enough to have developed a political attachment to him.

The left critics psychologize about our illusions, our false dreams, our longings for Messiahs and father figures, or inability to face unpleasant realities the way they can. They deliver patronizing admonitions about our "conspiracy captivation" and "Camelot yearnings." They urge us not to escape into fantasy. They are the cognoscenti who guide us and out-left us on the JFK assassination, a subject about which they know next to nothing and whose significance they have been unable to grasp. Having never read the investigative literature, they dismiss the investigators as irrelevant or irrational. To cloak their own position with intellectual respectability, they fall back on an unpracticed structuralism.

It is neither "Kennedy worship" nor "Camelot yearnings" that motivates our inquiry, but a desire to fight back against manipulative and malignant institutions so that we might begin to develop a system of accountable rule worthy of the name democracy.

Posted by brian @ 11/22/2003 02:18 PM EST


To all Vox readers: The following is a lucid commentary on how left wing idealogue Noam Chomsky colludes with right wing establishment to bury the truth about the JFK assination. Ask yourself why? Understand from a reasonable perspective, this apparent contradiction can only be reconciled within the context of Hegelian logic. The right/left dichotomy is just a propagandistic tool used by powerful, megalomaniacal, financial oligarchs to dupe the masses. It effectively focuses public scrutiny on false, illusionary targets and thus, maintains the veil of cover these sick creatures need to maintain their system of top down control. Don't count on establishment academicians, pundits and statist propaganda organs like CNN and Fox News to ever blow their cover. Instead, keep reading vox, exploring the internet and drilling truth into the heads of those too constrained by an emotional dependence on the status quo to ever figure it out. Also, understand this forum isn't some sort of intellectual paintball war or color by numbers hobby horse. Its the real thing, so take some initiative and responsibility and do something socially constructive. As vox says "know your enemy and fight the big fight."
Why Care About JFK? By Mike Parenti 1996-From Dirty Truths

The left critics argue that people who are concerned about the JFK assassination are romanticizing Kennedy and squandering valuable energy. Chomsky claims that the Nazi-like appeals of rightist propagandists have a counterpart on the Left: "It's the conspiracy business. Hang around California, for example, and the left has just been torn to shreds because they see CIA conspiracies . . . secret governments [behind] the Kennedy assassination. This kind of stuff has just wiped out a large part of the left" (Against the Current 56, 1993). Chomsky offers no evidence to support this bizarre statement.

The left critics fear that people will be distracted or misled into thinking well of Kennedy. Cockburn argues that Kennedy was nothing more than a servant of the corporate class, so who cares how he was killed (Nation 3/9/92 and 5/18/92). The left critics' hatred of Kennedy clouds their judgment about the politcal significance of his murder. They mistake the low political value of the victim with the high political importance of the assassination, its implications for democracy, and the way it exposes the gangster nature of the state.

In 1894 Captain Alfred Dreyfus was a conservative militarist. Clemenceau once conjectured that if the man's name had not been Dreyfus, he would have been an anti-Dreyfusard. Does that mean that the political struggle waged around l'affaire Dreyfus was a waste of time? The issue quickly became larger than Dreyfus, drawn between Right and Left, between those who stood with the army and the anti-Semites and those who stood with the republic and justice.

Likewise Benigno Aquino, a member of the privileged class in the Philippines, promised no great structural changes, being even more conservative than Kennedy. Does this mean the Filipino people should have dismissed the conspiracy that led to his assassination as an event of no great moment, an internal ruling-class affair? Instead, they used it as ammunition to expose the hated Marcos regime.

Archbishop Romero of El Salvador was a member of the Salvadoran aristocracy. He could not have risen to the top of the church hierarchy otherwise. But after he began voicing critical remarks about the war and concerned comments about the poor, he was assassinated. If he had not been murdered, I doubt that Salvadoran history would have been much different. Does this mean that solidarity groups in this country and El Salvador should not have tried to make his murder an issue that revealed the homicidal gangster nature of the Salvadoran state? (I posed these questions to Chomsky in an exchange in Z Magazine, but in his response, he did not address them.)

Instead of seizing the opportunity, some left writers condescendingly ascribe a host of emotional needs to those who are concerned about the assassination cover-up. According to Max Holland, a scribe who seems to be on special assignment to repudiate the JFK conspiracy: "The nation is gripped by a myth . . . divorced from reality," and "Americans refuse to accept their own history." In Z Magazine (10/92) Chomsky argued that "at times of general malaise and social breakdown, it is not uncommon for millenarian movements to arise." He saw two such movements in 1992: the response to Ross Perot and what he called the "Kennedy revival" or "Camelot revival." Though recognizing that the audiences differ, he lumps them together as "the JFK-Perot enthusiasms." Public interest in the JFK assassination, he says, stems from a "Camelot yearning" and the "yearning for a lost Messiah."

I, for one, witnessed evidence of a Perot movement involving millions of people but I saw no evidence of a Kennedy revival, certainly no millenarian longing for Camelot or a "lost Messiah." However, there has been a revived interest in the Kennedy assassination, which is something else. Throughout the debate, Chomsky repeatedly assumes that those who have been troubled about the assassination must be admirers of Kennedy. In fact, some are, but many are not. Kennedy was killed in 1963; people who today are in their teens, twenties, thirties, and forties - most Americans - were not old enough to have developed a political attachment to him.

The left critics psychologize about our illusions, our false dreams, our longings for Messiahs and father figures, or inability to face unpleasant realities the way they can. They deliver patronizing admonitions about our "conspiracy captivation" and "Camelot yearnings." They urge us not to escape into fantasy. They are the cognoscenti who guide us and out-left us on the JFK assassination, a subject about which they know next to nothing and whose significance they have been unable to grasp. Having never read the investigative literature, they dismiss the investigators as irrelevant or irrational. To cloak their own position with intellectual respectability, they fall back on an unpracticed structuralism.

It is neither "Kennedy worship" nor "Camelot yearnings" that motivates our inquiry, but a desire to fight back against manipulative and malignant institutions so that we might begin to develop a system of accountable rule worthy of the name democracy.

Posted by brian @ 11/22/2003 02:19 PM EST


I search the world for truth, Ha.
Truth as found is as a joke, a misnomer.
We are feed fear as a drunk on beer.
The news is designed to soften us up.
Our government and the Zionist
news is designed now to destroy our
reason our your mind, makes you feel nuts.
The war of the mind and reason is now on.
Welcome to the NWO of mind control.
If they can destroy your spirit they win.
The war is in your own mind now.
What a concept.
You are Fucked...........

Posted by RONN @ 11/22/2003 06:07 PM EST


The House of Rothschild?The first international bankers!!!The Bank of International Settlements(B.I.S.)where all central banks meet.

Posted by Burp @ 11/22/2003 08:09 PM EST


"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
--- President John F. Kennedy

Let's concentrate on:

1. Voting. We all have the right to vote. Do what you can to get rid of the Diebold machines before 2004. There is nothing wrong with paper ballots counted by volunteers. It's a system that's hard to corrupt.

2. Axe the Patriot Act 2. It is absolutely insane our representatives have allowed this to happen. Demand that the police and military honor the constitution. If you are in the military or police, remember that you are beholden to the constitution, not to someone who gives you an order against it. Neuremberg ruled that following orders is never an excuse for atrocity.

3. Take back the media. Starting your own web page is a good start. Try asking your cable company to carry British, Canadian or Australian news channels.

Did you know there is CNN International for the rest of the world and a special dumbed down American CNN for us?

Posted by Sammy @ 11/22/2003 09:25 PM EST


Check out this analysis just published in NY-IMC. You will LOVE this!

http://nyc.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=82574&group=webcast

Posted by Gramps @ 11/22/2003 10:33 PM EST


Brian,
Yeah Chomsky's wrong about some things such as the JFK assassination. That's because he's an acamedic professor who sticks eclusively to undisputed published facts for his analysis - that's his professional niche as the leading progressive critic. Given that, his analysis is impeccable within that context. In fact, his analysis alone should be enough to cause people to riot in the streets with regard to the elite consensus running US policy.

Posted by MR. ELEVEN @ 11/23/2003 03:11 PM EST


I don't want to move this thread off topic, but let it be known Chomsky is a diversionary shill. Listen to some of public speeches, and you'll soon understand Chomsky lives, eats, breathes World Government and the U.N.. He'll say things like "Well, the U.S. Government hasn't followed U.N. resolution 356 and is is violation of international law... Israel is in violation of over 20 separate U.N. resolutions". He is 98% good info, and 2% rat poison--and Chomsky's poison of preaching U.N. is what makes him dangerous. Chomsky is there to redirect those who are starting to learn the truth about what going on, and stick them corner. Like saying "Theres nothing to see here folks--no conspiracies, ohh and by the way anyone who mentions anything about conspiracies is in violation of U.N. resolution 666". Take a look at the Federalist papers #69, even the founding fathers mention the plausibility of conspiracies several times.

Then ask him about JFK assassination, or 9-11, or the Oklahoma City bombing, Waco, Freemasonry, The Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group, Freemasonry, Bohemian Grove, Skull and Bones. You won't get very much of an answer on any of these topics. I think he deemed the idea that 9-11 was an inside job (and I'm paraphrasing)--"An implausible internet conspiracy theory". There is literally tidal wave of evidence that compartmentalized agencies within the U.S Government such as CIA, and the Israeli Mossad orchestrated the whole thing. And as far as JFK assassination, chirst even the History Channel came out and said the government did it. Chomsky is not a dumb man, but his allegiance to the straight and narrow "official" version of events is obvious.

Posted by Zepherhills @ 11/23/2003 04:47 PM EST


Vox has some good articles on the Kennedy assassination, but the links inside the articles don't work because they reference his old site.

All you have to do is go to the address tool and change "voxnyc" to "voxfux" and the information is all there.

Posted by sammy @ 11/23/2003 06:00 PM EST


Nightmare on Elm Street

by Edgar J. Steele

22 November 2003

"(A) nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." --- President John F. Kennedy, in remarks made on the 20th anniversary of the Voice of America at H.E.W. Auditorium, February 26, 1962

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." --- President John F. Kennedy

Forty years ago tomorrow, on November 22, 1963, John F. Kennedy was shot and killed while riding in an open limousine down Elm Street, near Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas.

I watched last night's ABC "Special Report" with Peter Jennings, which did the best job of whitewashing the JFK assassination thatÊI have seen.Ê

Ê There were several holes in the ABC production, but the single most glaringÊconcerned the 3rd shot, to JFK's head, the one that threw his head back, documented thanks onlyÊto the Zapruder film (which the government suppressed for so long).

The Zapruder film was shown again and again, frame by frame, early on in this program, but always was stopped just prior to the head shot. So, too, the animated sequence they employed ignored the head shot. What they concentrated on disproving was the "magic bullet" theory, which says that the bullet which hit both JFK and Governor Connelly had to have taken a couple of impossible turns. It's the magician's stock in trade to distract you with one hand while doing the deed with the other, don't forget.

Jennings carefully ignored the head-shot issue until almost the very end of the program, then dealt with it in the context of a lengthy debunking of the Oliver Stone film, "JFK." Here is the entirety of Jennings' explanation: "A bullet can throw a body in any direction." That's it. I kid you not.

The head shot is the single most incontrovertible item proving there was more than one shooter. I was amazed toÊsee such a costly and slick production essentially ignore the most important aspect of the case.Ê The very first time I saw the Zapruder film, I became a believer that, at minimum, there were two shooters.

Try this for yourself: get a hundred watermelons and set them on a stone wall. Then, fire a high-velocity rifle slug at each in turn. Every single one will be thrown backward. Every one. Not one will deviate.Ê

There is an initial explosion in all directions upon impact of a projectile into an object. Then, as a bullet passes through an object, more and more of its velocity is transmitted into that object. Thus, a solid object goes directly and violently along the path of the projectile. A mushy object, like a watermelon or a human head, doesn't go as quickly, but it goes along that path, just the same. The laws of physics are like that - constant and repeatable.

You can download a complete copy of the Zapruder film for yourself from this site: http://cdo.co.uk/jfk/download.php?show=zapruder

Watch it closely and you will see the spray of blood that erupts from the front of Kennedy's head when that bullet impacts, just as you will see those watermelons spray juice toward you in reaction to the rifle slugs (the juice actually is traveling in all directions, but you can only see that which is flying back from the object, of course). Remember how Jackie was covered in blood spray afterwards, as she stood next to LBJ in Air Force One during his swearing in? Notice that, at the moment of the head shot, she has turned and is directly facing JFK from aside him as he claws at the wound in his throat. Remember all those gory gangster movies that so authentically show the shooter getting spattered with blood when taking a close-up kill shot? Remember the accidental shot that John Travolta makes inside the car in "Pulp Fiction?" Blood sprays back from the point of impact. Every time.

Even more persuasive are the JFK autopsy photos, which show the gaping exit wound in the back of his skull: http://www.jfklancer.com/aphotos.html Compare them to the exit "wounds" in the backs of all those watermelons you just killed. Compare the much smaller entry wounds, too.

It is a standard trial lawyer trick to allow the other side to proceed to trial with as many weak issues as possible, so that the trial can be made to seem to be about them. Then, the real weakness is glossed over. Often, the jury simply does not notice. That is what has been done by Peter Jennings in the current ABC program. He is very convincing on the issues he chooses, because those are the issues that support the Oswald-as-lone-gunman story. There are others, however, with the head shot issue merely being the most glaring.

Oswald said it plainly before he was, himself, assassinated: "I'm a patsy." Hear it for yourself: http://home.cfl.rr.com/mayhr01/audio/patsy.wav

The best and most thoroughgoing analysis of the JFK assassination I have seen is Michael C. Piper's book, Final Judgment, which now is all but banned in America and therefore very hard to find, since it is out of print. You would be well advised to secure and read a copy, if at all possible.

The real tipoff came at the very end, when Jennings explained why so many want there to have been a conspiracy: simply to justify so monstrous a crime. "Six million dead on one side of the scale and the Nazi regime on the other - huge crime balanced by a huge criminal. Similarly, people want JFK to have been killed by something other than that wretched waif, Oswald."Ê

Jennings' invocation of the now ritual, semi-religious "holocaust" shows just who is in charge, and makes clear on which side of this issue all right-thinking Americans are expected to land.

Ê Members of this list think for themselves, fortunately.

John F. Kennedy was a good man, an individual thinker and a courageous individual. He would have proven to be a great president, despite the tragedy that his civil rights program has become. He was the last of a breed.

JFK's death marked the beginning of a coup that now has come to full flower in America. Freddy Krueger would be proud.

New America. An idea whose time has come.

EDGAR J. STEELE

Posted by Edgar J Steele @ 11/24/2003 09:03 AM EST


Cant someone take out this Nazi Rapist piece of dog shit? He is ruining our once great nation.

Posted by Chapel @ 11/24/2003 01:27 PM EST


Have you heard of VIDEO Surveillance?
Buy a bunch of cameras and VCR's, hide them well. They can be placed anywhere and cant be seen. Record these bastards and publish their pictures on the internet.

Anyone who suspects they are being watched or broken into can catch this scum on video.

EXPOSE them publically.

Posted by Dick Porter @ 11/25/2003 10:50 AM EST


Hey people of VOX...
Listen. All the time spent on facts and figures and who did what is not really getting it together. I have spent quite sometime on it too! we All have..

Think for a second, What is going to happen. We are in the midst of a war. Bio/Info/Psi Op/You name it the war is on...it is a matter if time, a short time inded...say 3-5 years and everyone of us will either be fighting the scum, or working for them by choice,force or fear.
Act. Get it together, act like you think. If you study anything out there figure out how to ride this sucker out...cuz if you do not get hit within the first blasts...what ever those blasts may be...you may be here for a bit....you may get hit and still have to be on Earth...
get your minds right. Think like a fighter....read the "art of war" for a start. The hardest thing in war is to see the enemy. The enmies hide. However these fuckers do not hide. They have become to big...why do you think they are upping the tactics...it's almost time to begin the "cleansing"...
They have
No Fear
Soverignty (sic)
True knowledge of history
Patience

4 things you can all give yourslef...but it takes work.
Those of us who are against these scum, and I imagine all are but the "plants" out here....
They cannot see all of us...in fact most of us are invisable to them....we are the next revolutionaries...as JFK said "we are the heirs of that 1st revolution"

Find housing that will be safe when it goes down. If you do not trust your land lord or housing mngt company get out.
They will clean the cities first.
Unless you are in a free standing house with a private landlord you know and trust you are sitting ducks.
Buy steal or borrow or barter for a gun. I am non violent unless it's time to protect and help myself, friends or people I know are being messed with.
Get Healthy. Stop feeding yourself crap. Learn about your immune system. They count on people being sick. Within a year of the correct life style of nutrition you can make massive changes....you may have to learn how to not eat...real soon. Get strong...It is not a crime or a sin to know how to protect yourself in basic ways.
Find your spirit. They want that broken...care not what it takes for you to zone into a mind set that makes you strong and vigilent for the cause of your freedom.
Know that all you have to do is breathe and die. Alot worse things than death...we are all doing it anyway. The time to get real is now....definitly now!

Now as for the pope and all churches all polliticians all big business all entities that manipulate and rape and destroy our freedom....it is time for them to go.
VOTE with your dollar! Stop buying anything that helps them....it's hard cuz they got allot on lock down...start...know the enemy....be aware...even if you lose friends and people think you are paranoid....no, tell them you are prepaired.

no more time for games....it's all over but the end....sorry for the dower closing. Be positive and know that there are many uf "US" and fewer of "them"...

thanks VOX! Stay up and stay strong...you got people world wide who will help you if ya need it....I pass your site onto hundreds of people a day!

In the very near future it will all be about the look in someones eyes...the window to the soul...the vibes of people....this is not some hippie BS....how you resonate and vibrate has much to do with your path and your safty...many people are just gatekeepers, watch out for them as they are drones asleep.....peace

breathe!

Posted by breathe @ 11/26/2003 03:16 PM EST


The bio attack page is closed so I will post this here. The excuse for martial law could be a or several massive NWO induced earthquake/s rather than a bio attack. This will look like a natural event so be above suspicion to most people. If someone else has mentioned this I apologize. If not it would be well to remember when something like this occurs say in Los Angeles where a 9.0 quake has been planned according to someone writing in the seventies or eighties. Bush will be history as President as a new military dictatorship will according to their own brainwashing material replace him. they could take advantage of this national emergrency to unleash any number of weapons blaming it on terrorists and thus create enough chaos for to seize total control over each and every person, the mechanism for which is already in place. Solution. find a place to hide out where you can plant self regenerating seeds (probably available only from Canada) to help you once your supplies run out.

Posted by charlie @ 11/29/2003 03:03 AM EST


31 Questions and Answers about the Internal Revenue Service

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm

Therein lies information dealing directly with the beast JFK attempted to best, and was assassinated for. I will not post the entirety contained, as I will lose all of the hyperlinks within the material. Here is one sweet excerpt, that may entice you:

----

2. If not an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury, then what exactly is the IRS?

Answer: The IRS appears to be a collection agency working for foreign banks and operating out of Puerto Rico under color of the Federal Alcohol Administration (“FAA”). But the FAA was promptly declared unconstitutional inside the 50 States by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of U.S. v. Constantine, 296 U.S. 287 (1935), because Prohibition had already been repealed.

....

When all the evidence is examined objectively, IRS appears to be a money laundry, extortion racket, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951 and 1961 et seq. (“RICO”). Think of Puerto RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act); in other words, it is an organized crime syndicate operating under false and fraudulent pretenses.

Posted by Entangled Hierarchy @ 11/29/2003 07:52 PM EST


Wellstone action site http://www.wellstone.org/

Posted by totse @ 11/30/2003 09:54 PM EST


More reasons for revolution:

www.deckofbush.com

www.chickenhawkcards.com


54 reasons NOT to re-elect the un-elected FRAUD.


The Republican CHICKENHAWKS of America.

Spread the word. Great facts in both and great reference next time you are stuck debating that idiot conservative.

Posted by Tom Varveris @ 12/02/2003 02:04 AM EST


THREE SHOOTERS SIX SHOTS, TRIANGULATED FIRE .

Posted by KIT CARSON @ 12/02/2003 09:27 PM EST


Hi y'all,

I was just ponderin'....
If the government covered up to protect the government in '63. Then why are they still covering up now?
UNLESS, the people in power now either are connected to people who could still get busted.

Pete

Posted by Pete @ 12/08/2003 07:50 PM EST

Powered By voxfux