06/20/2002 Entry: "The Architecture of Global Domination"
The Architecture of Global Conquest
Step one.... Terrorize Americans
by voxfux
The plan was clear 20 years ago. The central struggle for the domination of the planet Earth would have it's locus in Eurasia (3/4 of the worlds resources and people are there). Bad luck for the people and cultures who currently inhabit Eurasia. The US military industrial juggernaut rampaging towards them is the most cunning, bloodthirsty and ruthless force seen since Adolf Hitler. But before this evil force takes over the world they have to take over America, for only if you have the complicity of the American people do you control the military engine for the imposition of this global Pax Americana.
But Americans have no thirst for global conquest.
Unless of course... There is a sudden and terrifing threat!
So what to you do when you have no enemies with the strength to attack you? - You attack yourself and say they did. The grand architect of this playing field of global conquest through deception and cunning is Zbigniew Brzezinski, the magnetic former National Security Advisor to the President, Trilateral Commission founder, distinguished board memner of the Council of Foreign Relations, and honored host of the secret Bilderberg group. This heaviest of the heavyweights is now more influential in the dark machinations of global conquest than Henry Kissinger ever was.
Immorality plays a big part of Brzezinski's game plan due to it's conspicuous absence. He speaks of the conquest of all the other nations of the world basically for their own good. Time and time again he specifically instructs the ruthless and dangerous hawks he knows exist in the state department, military and industrial realms in the United States on the blueprints of American Imperialist global domination through a terror campaign at home. He writes:
"The attitude of the American public toward the external projection of American power has been much more ambivalent. The public supported America’s engagement in World War II largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. (pp 24-5)
This is the first mention, hint of the concept he will develop later in the book and zero in on.
He later get's more specific:
"It is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America’s power, especially its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public’s sense of domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is, defense spending) and the human sacrifice (casualties, even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization." (p.35)"
Well that's quite a bit more specific. He's calling America a bit too Democratic, limiting our ability to ruthlessly intimidate other nations. The suggestion here is that we could use a rollback of; democracy, human rights, constitutional rights, due process, etc, etc. This paragraph echos a nearly identically (conceptually)statement from Hitler's general, Herman Ghoreng who said:
"Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war: neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." - Reichmarshall Hermann Goering
Later in the book Brzezinski further instructs these evil plotters:
"Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat." (p. 211)
Well there you have it. The time tested self terrorism. Surest method of first controlling the American people then the former Soviet Sates then Eurasia and finally the world!
Check back as this article grows.
voxfux
Viewer Commentary: 8 comments
"Corporate entities are persons, under the law. They are separate persons from the very real human persons who own them and run them. We have the Supreme Court of the United States to thank for this perversion. Through corruption of our government and courts, corporations subverted their original intended purpose and acquired the legal status of "natural persons" while also preserving their limited-liability legal protections (which gives them more legal powers than citizens have). This subversion was institutionalized in an 1886 Supreme Court decision of which Justice William O. Douglas would later write, "There was no history, logic, or reason given to support that view." Thus corporations gained Bill of Rights protections and more, even before women and minorities had full protection."
- [Anonymous]
I have the source for this quote. It's from "The Shadow of the Swastika" by R. William Davis. It can be found here, it's an interesting article.
darkconspiracy.com/conspiracies/bigbrother/inpriv/swas.txt
Posted by anon @ 06/26/2002 08:21 PM EST
Good, but do keep in mind, in relation to the "dirty Nuke" article, that Brzezinski started making these plans when Clinton was in office, in complete cooperation with the White House, which scheduled military "exercises" in Central Asia starting in '97. This isn't simply Bush's war, the entire elite is in on it.
VOX RESPONSE ANNOTATION: Not exactly"Mr Secretary."
If you know the clandestine underworld, or the entire intelligence community for that matter you will know that they are all CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS- Never democrats.
Furthermore the Bush group is, as I said, a private group with "Insiders" within the current US intelligence apperatus who co-operate, (note those insiders are at the VERY top of the military and intelligence communities.)
Now regarding when Brzezinski started making those plans, that wasn't during Clintons term, it was in 1989 during Bush Sr.'s term. How do I know? Because Brzezinski told me, I have my notes of the conversation.
And finally although the entire "elite" as you call them (I would use another word) is indeed in on it, it takes facilitators at the top in the military and intelligence world to make the terrorism happen and an insider in the executive office (Bush) to plunder the treasury in response to the terrorism.
Voxfux
Posted by Jack Straw @ 07/02/2002 02:45 PM EST
Brzezinski has learned his lessons from history, as have the Bushes. Totalitarianism is easy. But fortunately for us all, Bush and his crew are such bungling idiots that for sure their plans will implode on them, unfortunately on us as well. Bush is not going to survive very long because the American people know they were much better off before Bush took the reigns. Since then it has been nothing but a return to the worst repetitions of history, energy "crisis's, Oil wars, lying immorality, etc, etc.
The people know by now that they are in a world of shit and it's because of Bush.
The sooner we get rid of this fuck in the white house the better,
And then we should make a law NO MORE BUSHES EVER AGAIN FOR PRESIDENT.
IntelQ
Posted by IntelQ @ 07/06/2002 11:48 AM EST
Bush has got to go...
Posted by Here Here @ 07/06/2002 08:34 PM EST
Brzezinski's 1997 book "Game Plan" spelled out pretty much the same thing. It's worth the read if you want to get into the headspace of these Pentagon types.
Posted by NorthEasterner @ 07/20/2002 04:11 PM EST
The REAL elite are NOT part of the Bushes.
Starwars, attack of the clones is how this game is played.
The Bushes are played like puppets, including all insiders that participate.
They are used as the Dark Force.
The REAL elite you can see flying unindentified in our skies.
They are from the "Orion" group.
Density 4 and 5 level negatieve entities.
It was THEM that gave mankind this BOOST in science and it is THEM that gave your goverment the Roswell UFO. It is them that by telepathy gave insights on how to build an atom bomb ect.
And they are what we have to defeat. Not some Bush-drone.
Without knowledge you cannot defeat them. With knowledge they are slain already. If you dont know how creation works you wil be in dangerous times. However if you know how this GRAND GAME is played you wil be alive and kicking on 22 december 2012 when this planet wil go into density 4 positieve.
If you want the truth on how creation works and what is happening on planet earth i would suggest studying the Law of One material. Which was given to us by RA. Try the search-engines and you wil get there.
No protest wil be helpfull at this stage.
No patriotic guy that wants shoot the Bushes out of there homes will succeed.
No article will avert the coming tribulation.
IT WIL ALL COME TO PASS!
You can only be save if you open up your inner heart and SEE THAT YE NOT BE TROUBLED!
FOR THOSE WIL BE SAVED.
RA
Posted by RA @ 08/06/2002 08:31 AM EST
A friend of mine spoke to several lawyers on the subject of "corporations as persons", and they said that corporations are NOT considered persons, and do NOT have any constitutional rights under the law.
The lawyers said that corporations were given the name "person" to avoid taxes, but that's as far as the law extends.
If you challenge a corporation because their rights trump those of a person, and they win, then you pretty much know the judge in the case deserves investigating.
These lawyers say that it is NOT the law that has been perverted, but the institutions which interpret and enforce it.
I forget the particulars off-hand, but if you so desire, I'm sure I can find them.
Posted by Jordan Thornton @ 08/30/2002 12:10 PM EST
Rumor Mill News Reading Room Forum
President Bush: Clean Out the Nest of Likud Spies
Posted By: Rosalinda
Date: Sunday, 15 September 2002, 12:45 p.m.
Former President George H.W. Bush, a.k.a. "Bush 41," no doubt
vividly recalls the October 1975 Ford Administration purge, that
brought him in as Director of Central Intelligence, and brought
Gen. Brent Scowcroft in as National Security Adviser.
Bush 41 ought to counsel his son, the current President
(a.k.a. "Bush 43"), to launch a house cleaning to begin
the process of purging his administration of a nest of Israeli
agents of influence; who, if left in place through the end of
this month, will likely succeed in dragging the United States and
much of the rest of the world into a Clash of Civilizations war
-- beginning with Iraq -- that will sweep the entire planet into
the bloody maelstrom of a 14th Century-like New Dark Age.
The "cabal" of Israeli Likud agents is deeply penetrated
into the civilian staff of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, the
senior policy staff in the Office of Vice President Dick Cheney,
and in several crucial policy pockets at the State Department.
Some leading "cabalists" were at the top of the list of suspected
collaborators of convicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard --
including Richard Perle, head of the Defense Policy Board.
Vice President Cheney's chief of staff and national security
adviser, Lewis Libby, was a Yale protege of Deputy Defense
Secretary Paul Wolfowitz in 1973, and served as his State
Department and Pentagon deputy in the Reagan and Bush 41
Administrations.
Other Israeli assets inside Cheney's office
include chief foreign policy aide John Hannah, who previously
worked for the leading Israeli think-tank in Washington, the
Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP); and Eric
Edelman, a former Wolfowitz deputy at the Bush 41 Pentagon.
Incest is the favorite pastime inside the Washington
Beltway, so the existence of this cabal might not shock many
jaded Washington observers.
But the character of this network is
that they have publicly declared themselves to be at the service
of the Israeli Likud regime.
Perle, Douglas Feith (current Assistant Secretary of Defense
for Policy), and David Wurmser (current executive assistant to
chief State Department arms control negotiator John Bolton) were
the principal authors of a July 1996 study for then-Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, which called for a "clean break"
from the Oslo peace process, the annexation of the Occupied
Territories, and the permanent destabilization of the entire Arab
world.
The cabal has been dedicated to foisting this right-wing
Israeli foreign policy on G.W. Bush, from the first day that
ex-Secretary of State George Shultz took charge of "Team Bush"
in April 1998, and installed Wolfowitz and Condoleezza Rice as
the President's two chief foreign policy and national security
tutors. Wolfowitz promptly paraded the entire cabal, beginning
with Perle, down to Austin to sell G.W. on the (Israeli) policy
of war on Iraq.
So what is to be done? Let us start with a purgative first step.
The July 10, 2002 session of the Defense Policy Board, at
which now former RAND Corporation "senior analyst" Laurent
Murawiec delivered his diatribe against Saudi Arabia -- including
the call for American occupation and takeover of the Saudi oil
fields -- was recently denounced by Gen. Anthony Zinni, former
head of the Central Command, as an unforgiveable outrage. We
agree. The Pentagon official who bears line-of-command
responsibility for that infamy is Doug Feith.
Feith was one of the Netanyahu advisers behind the "Clean
Break" policy, and he repeated his total opposition to a
Palestinian state in a 1999 book, which he co-authored for the
Zionist Organization of America. His sponsoring the Saudi-bashing
session is consistent with every other aspect of his performance
at the Pentagon. He is in open defiance of President George W.
Bush's often-stated policy of a "two-state solution" to the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Feith's removal is not only appropriate, it is vital.
American foreign policy ought to be made by Americans
who do NOT have dual loyalties;
certainly not by people who have unambiguous single loyalties --
which are not to the United States.
Mr. President, let the Nest-cleaning begin.
Posted by Mr Clean @ 09/16/2002 12:28 PM EST
